Throughout 2001, UKIRT's delivered seeing was
regularly monitored with UFTI. Whenever UFTI is in use a routine
automatically performs photometry on all frames taken and a Gaussian
fit is used to estimate the FWHM of the central source. The results
are rich in statistical information and are analyzed by a code
produced by the author. In order to avoid extended objects, we only
employ observations of faint standards. Also, the code only selects
the final mosaics, in order to perform analysis on an image with a
relatively long exposure time. Finally, the code corrects the
measurements to their equivalents at 1.0 airmasses and the K band,
using standard dependences of the image size on airmass and
wavelength.
UT coverage is binned into 5 bins, each covering 2
hours from 6 to 16 hours UT. Seeing is distributed into 20 bins,
between 0 and 2 arcsec.The resulting histograms are shown in Figure 1,
along with a plot of seeing versus UT through the night. Table 1 also
shows the median seeing for each UT bin and two extra UT bins at the
beginning and end of the night. The additional bins, at UT 4-6 hours and
UT 16-18 hours, both represent significantly smaller populations than
the other UT bins and so their histograms are not shown in Figure
1.
These data show clearly the variation of seeing
through the night. The histogram for the UT range 6-8 hours in figure
1 shows that by this time, the seeing has essentially stabilized,
helped by the dome ventilation system. As the night progresses, the
seeing gradually improves further. The best seeing is most often
observed after 2am HST (12am UT). The histogram representing the UT
range 12-14 hours demonstrates this clearly, with the counts quickly
rising to 0.5 arcsec, and then tailing off slowly. The median seeing
for this time of the night drops to approximately 0.53 arcsec (see
Table 1).
Table 2 shows seasonal variations in the seeing
statistics. Each number in the table represents the percentage of each
month for which seeing was below a given value. August stands out as
the best month, with seeing being better than 0.5 arcsec 49% of the
time. July and September follow August as the next best months. At
face value, November seems to be anomalous; but UFTI was rarely used
during November, and then only towards the end of the month when
conditions were very good.
The overall median seeing for 2001, measured by
Gaussian fitting as described above, was 0.6arcsec. While comparisons
between these data and those obtained during the 1998 seeing campaign
with IRCAM are probably invalidated by the use of different
instrumentation, different methods of measuring the image quality (and
of course the different epoch), there are some similarities, notably
the distinct improvement in the seeing in late summer.
With an El Nino forecast for the coming year, we
will be monitouring future changes to the median seeing with interest!
UKIRT's observatory statistics show that in its
first 5 months of operations, Michelle was available for over 400
hours, of which 60% were observed, 1% were lost to faults and the rest
lost to bad weather. These impressive figures are a fair reflection of
the success that Michelle has enjoyed, with articles elsewhere in this
issue illustrating the leap in performance at thermal infrared
wavelengths that Michelle has brought to UKIRT.
All of Michelle's faculties have been used for successful PATT
allocated programmes, from straightforward imaging to spectroscopy at
low and high spectral resolutions, and even a little
spectro-polarimetry. Of course there have been some problems. The
four hours of lost time implied by the figures above hide a handful of
runs that were lost due to either the cryostat front window becoming
opaque because of water damage, or the recent (February 2002), loss of
cooling power at the detector. The possibility of a recurrence of
these problems is being eliminated as quickly as the busy observing
schedule allows.
The details of Michelle's delivered performance are still being
evaluated for publication in the next few months, but some basic
conclusions are readily apparent.
Most importantly, although the sensitivities for imaging and
spectroscopy are not far off the target of background limited
performance, there are a number of factors which make some programmes
rather more difficult to carry out than might be expected. For
example, imaging through the 50% pass band filter at 10µm
does not produce the
anticipated sensitivity gain over the 10% pass band filters. This is
due to a combination of the limited detector readout rate and the high
sky background seen by the broad band filter. As a rough guide, in a
60 minute observation using the 50% pass band filter under typical
seeing and sky conditions (Tau at 225 Ghz of 0.1), only 20 minutes
will be spent collecting photons from the target, and a strong
detection will only be achieved on sources brighter than 10mJy.
The planning applet on the JAC/Michelle web site will be modified
to reflect the new sensitivity figures (please check the revision date
at the top of the applet web page.)
Michelle is currently planned to be available on UKIRT until the
end of September 2002. It will then have a new detector with improved
cosmetic properties fitted, before being transferred to Gemini North
where on-telescope commissioning is planned for January.
The Observation Management Project (OMP) - towards a flexible UKIRT
Frossie Economou & Andy Adamson
JAC
UKIRT has been testing the waters of flexible scheduling for the
last two years, with a great deal of success. We undertook thsee
experiments with the encouragement of the UKIRT Board in order to
demonstrate that it is possible to take full advantage of good weather
conditions for programmes that need them the most.
Our mini-flex experiments consisted of selecting two PATT projects and
flexing between them in a block of time equal to the sum of their
two "classical" allocations. The results are
significant: Under the mini-flex conditions we have achieved
completion rates of more than 90% for programmes which, if classically
scheduled, would have achieved less than 20%.
In general this has worked best when scheduling a programme that has
particular weather requirements along with one which has not. This has
enabled us to flex programmes with seeing and telluric water vapour
requirements. It is clearly also possible to flexibly schedule programmes
requiring photometric weather, but to date we have not attempted this.
The release of ORAC (and in particular the ORAC-OT) at UKIRT has
formalised observation preparation and has enabled us to contemplate
the next step: providing software support to aid flexible scheduling.
So far our mini-flex experiments were carried out "manually" - in fact
what was being flexed was control of the observer's chair at the
summit! The actual observing took place as it would have on a
classical night.
If we are to extend the practice of flexible scheduling without
increasing the load on the observer or UKIRT staff, we
need software that will automate all stages of the process. Since our
partner telescope, the JCMT, has been working towards this for some
time under the guise of the OMP (the Obsevatory Management Project),
we joined with them in order to produce a common software suite that
will support flexible scheduling at UKIRT as well.
What does UKIRT look like in a potential OMP era? Quite similar to
UKIRT in the ORAC era, in fact. PIs will be expected to gain PATT time
and prepare their programmes with the ORAC-OT as they do now. There
will be only two significant differences at this stage. Firstly, PIs
will be expected to include a Site Quality Component in their
projects. This will contain requirements on seeing, photometric
conditions, tau and moon brightness. Secondly, observations in a
submitted science programme are assumed schedulable at any time; if a
PI wants two observations scheduled together (for example because one
is a calibrator for the other) they have to group them together in
what we call an MSB, a `Minimum Schedulable Block', which is the
scheduling quantum if you like. A single observation is assumed to be
an MSB of one; if that observation is a long integration that can be
done on different nights, the PI can turn it into several MSBs of
shorter duration, thus increasing its chances of being scheduled later
in the night where a longer observation would not fit.
When a PI submits their science programme, much magic takes place. The
OMP provides a sophisticated database server which takes the submitted
program, splits it into its constituent MSBs and extracts information
of a schedulable nature - not only the Site Quality information but
also RAs, estimated duration, instrument configuration and so on. This
information is stored in a relational database for efficient
searching.
Currently at the telescope, the observer uses the ORAC-OM to retrieve
a given PI's entire science programme, visually selects an observation
from a list of names and sends it to the ORAC acquisition system for
execution. Under the OMP, the observer will be able to use a `Query
Tool' (the QT) to retrieve the most appropriate MSBs in any PI's
programme. Criteria for the selection include whether the source is
currently accessible, the weather conditions and the instrument
availability. Although the list of MSBs will be sorted using an
algorithm that folds the conditions with project properties such as
TAG priority and completion status, the observer will be free to
exercise their judgement and choose an MSB that is further down the
list. They can also weed out certain instrument configurations - for
example a novice observer with only imaging experience may wish to
remove spectro-polarimetry MSBs from consideration.
Finally, we have learned from the JCMT experience that feedback to and
from the PI about their programme is vital to the success of flexible
scheduling because it increases scientific efficiency by encouraging
the PI's involvement. So the OMP will provide a feedback system
whereby the PI will be informed of the progress of their project, can
retrieve their data, and can discuss any issues with observatory
staff.
We note that the OMP does not enforce a strict queue
scheduled operation. For example there is no requirement for a Phase
II deadline, or for the entire time allocation to be requested at
once, or for a single queue manager. The aim is to allow for the
substantial gains of matching rare conditions to the projects best
able to make use of them while retaining all the best features of
classical scheduling: the ability to apportion your time as you choose,
to change your observing strategy on the basis of early results and to
have a support scientist who will help you make the most of your UKIRT
time.
The OMP software was written by Tim Jenness, Matthew Rippa and
Kynan Delorey at the JAC, and Martin Folger at the ATC. It will be
commissioned on the UKIRT service programme in early March with the
assistance of Paul Hirst. Following this and further tests in April,
the UKIRT Board in May will discuss the details of the flexing
process, observer selection, priority weighting, etc. Watch this
space..!
UIST in semester 02B
UIST, the imager/spectrometer/IFU instrument designed to replace and
augment the existing near-infrared instrumentation on UKIRT, has suffered
a delay due to high read noise which became apparent when the
science-grade Aladdin array was integrated into the cryostat late in 2001.
Semester 02A was already scheduled by the time it became clear that a
sizeable delay was inevitable. The UIST commissioning time which was
scheduled for May through July was therefore removed, and the semester
accordingly ends two weeks earlier than it otherwise would. As a result,
Semester 02B will include approximately two weeks at the end of July.
Unfortunately, previously-planned JCMT heavy engineering through the
summer imposes a further delay, whatever the progress of work on the read
noise. This means that the earliest UIST can be brought to the JAC will be
August 2002. Commissioning will follow and the instrument should be ready
for shared-risks use in mid-December. UIST proposals are therefore invited
for the end of Semester 02B.
Since this call for proposals is being made before the read noise has been
reduced to acceptable levels, PIs should note in the Technical Case of the
PATT form whether there are elements of your programme which could be
addressed with CGS4, IRCAM or UFTI. This will generally not apply to IFU
work or to programmes which require the long, simultaneous coverage
offered by the HK grism, for example; but standard imaging and single-band
spectroscopy can probably be accommodated to some extent by the existing
instrumentation in the event we are unable to offer UIST.
 
Sidney Arakaki
Sidney Arakaki, Head of JAC Instrumentation Support, died suddenly
in January 2002. Sidney was a key figure at the JAC, with more than
two decades of experience - first on UKIRT, then also on the JCMT -
and thus able to apply a huge amount of expertise in cryogenics, high
vacuum and instrumentation. Sidney of course had many very close
friends and colleagues both here at the JAC and at the UKATC in
Edinburgh, and he will be greatly missed. While the professional and
personal effects of his passing are perhaps not yet fully grasped, it
is clear that we have lost a greatly valued colleague, a strong
personality and a good friend.
 
View from the top
Thor Wold
JAC
It always amazes me...so much changes, yet so much stays the same.
Here we are, another six months and a semester have gone by. Michelle is
in action, going through the inevitable teething. UIST is delayed,
somewhat messing up our nice scheduling for semester 02A, but not anything
that cannot be dealt with.
The biggest change, though, is the loss of Sidney. I mean, it is
one thing to hire and train someone to take his place, but it is also
quite another thing entirely to replace his expertise, let alone his
being. He is already sorely missed.
|
|
Sidney with his gasolene-powered blender at the Michelle Attitude
Adjustment Party - the best Margaritas ever!
|
When I heard the news, I was totally flabbergasted. Sid was only
four months younger than I, what could possibly have gone wrong?
When I walked into the first day on this job, 17 years ago, Sid
was already here--and had been for a few years. After all these years, he
was one of the very few left that had been here longer than I...
I was fortunate in that I was not on-shift when his funeral took
place, but this was one of the darkest days I have had in years, as I
ended up going to TWO funerals that day. It turned out my former
Scoutmaster, college advisor and neighbor had passed away and ironically
the services preceded Sid's by only a matter of hours. The last funeral
I had been to was three years ago...the one before that, beyond
rememberance. And, here I was, going to two in one day.
Thinking that this surely must be a sign of times to come for
someone my age, it was with heavy heart that I left immediately and headed
across town to Harrington's. I thought for sure that Sid would not have
enjoyed what I went through one whit and that hoisting a few in his memory
at one of his watering holes was surely what he would have appreciated.
I got there and there was nobody at all at the bar. Harrington's
bar is quite small; there are only four barstools. I saw a Beck's dark
sitting by the window, so I took the second stool in and ordered myself
one of the same.
It was not too much later that a school teacher came in and asked
if the seat was taken, and the bartender explained that the Beck's dark
by the window was in honor of a good friend who's funeral had just taken
place. Sid mostly stood there by the window, holding up the end of the
bar. He wasn't one for much sitting.
A little later on quite a few of the gang, who had
been at the services, drifted in. We hoisted a few in Sid's honor and
enjoyed good repartee and comraderie; it seemed everyone had the same idea
that this was most appropriate.
In fact, folks felt that this was not quite enough; another
get-together took place a week later at Charley's in Kea'au, another of
Sid's watering holes.
I think we all thought that Sid would have been pleased. He
certainly would have been in the thick of it if he could have been there.
You have probably heard all the standard cliches...live every day,
enjoy yourself, love life, love what you are doing in your work, etc.,
etc. I am sure Sid sure did.
So, that is the answer to my gloom. Thank you, Sid!
Arrivals and departures
In the past 12 months UKIRT has seen a number of
staff changes. In Issues 8 and 9 of the UKIRT Newsletter we bade a
fond Aloha to Tim Hawarden and John Davies, who have both
returned to the ATC in Edinburgh. To replace them we would now like to
welcome Marc Seigar and Jane Buckle to the UKIRT team of Support
Scientists.
Marc graduated from Liverpool John Moores
University and arrived in Hilo via Post Doc. positions at Imperial
College, London and the University of Ghent in Belgium. He works on
galaxies of all shapes, flavours and forms, and has already
contributed to the Newsletter! He is a regular on the soccer pitch
(surprising, considering he's an Arsenal fan) and, from the look of
his new car, seems to be settling in nicely to the Hawaiian
lifestyle.
Jane came to us from UMIST where she recently
obtained her Ph.D and completed a year as a Post Doc. Her research
interests include disks, jets and outflows around young stars. Jane
enjoys cycling and, to her credit, still hasn't bought a
car. Surviving in Hilo without a car is like walking across the moon
without your helmet on - challenging, to say the least! Happily, Marc
says she can borrow his car anytime...
We are also delighted to welcome Brad Cavanagh to
the JAC. Some regular visitors to Hilo may remember Brad, who was a
Co-op student here a few years ago. Well, he must have had a good time
because he's come back for more! Brad will be working on software
support and development at UKIRT, and has already signed up for the
next five years with the JAC soccer team (though he doesn't know it
yet!).
The JAC also now has a Science Outreach
Specialist, in the guise of Douglas Pierce-Price. Douglas, famous
the world over for his work on the SCUBA map of the Galactic Centre
(see the JCMT web pages for details), will be promoting the
world-beating science routinely carried out with UKIRT and JCMT (by
you lot!). So, if you have something astronomical to shout
about, perhaps some results worthy of a press release, please send
Douglas the details (d.pierce-price@jach.hawaii.edu)! When
not promoting the JAC, Douglas will be continuing his research on the
Galactic Centre and his work on data reduction algorythms.
We'd also like to welcome David Laird and John
Pascual to the JAC. Dave brings with him much experience from his many
years at the ATC in Edinburgh, where he worked on many of UKIRT's past
and present instruments. While in Hawaii, Dave plans on taking up
golf. For clubs, he's already invested in a set of Walmart's finest.
John and his family lived on the Big Island before joining the JAC, so
they will already know their Poi from their Portuguese sausage...
John takes on the position of electronic/electrical engineer.
As many observers will know, Alistair Glasse is
currently at the JAC on secondment from the ATC. Alistair is in Hilo
commissioning Michelle on UKIRT (with Tom Kerr), and from the science
already being achieved (see articles in this Newsletter), he's clearly
been doing a great job! He expects to return to Edinburgh this summer,
though probably it'll be too late to see Newcastle United come second
in the English Premiership (behind Arsenal, quips Marc...).
Finally, Linsay Marcer, our finance officer,
returned to PPARC in Swindon after 3 years in Hilo. She was replaced
by Sally Nicol who (during working hours) will be keeping us all on
the straight-and-narrow, financially speaking at least.
UNITED KINGDOM INFRARED TELESCOPE
Newsletter
Issue 10, Spring 2002