JAC Style guide: template
Prompt entrainment in the `wiggling' molecular jet from RNO 15-FIR
Introduction
How are massive, molecular (CO) outflows driven by collimated jets from
young stars? In recent years there has been considerable attention
given to this question. Theoretical studies suggest that ambient gas
may be accelerated, either in a turbulent mixing layer along the length
of the jet, or through the bow shock at the head of the jet. Both
models have their advantages: in the turbulent, "steady-state"
model, the mixing layer that developes across the interface between
the supersonic jet and its surroundings thickens with distance from the
source, as jet material and ambient gas is pulled into the layer.
Eventually the jet will be completely pinched off and the flow will
become fully turbulent and subsonic. Conversely, entrainment in the
bow shock or "prompt" model is more localised. Here, the ambient,
molecular gas swept up through each bow shock cools rapidly, and
although some of the gas may spill down the sides of the jet, a
high-velocity "clump" will develop just behind each shock front.
In an effort to distinguish between entrainment models, Chernin &
Masson (1995, ApJ 455, 182) recently measured the distribution of
momentum in a number of outflows. They point out that, in the
turbulent entrainment model, the momentum per unit length should
increase with distance from the source, as more and more of the jet
momentum is transfered to the swept up molecular gas. Conversely, in
the prompt entrainment model, the momentum decreases with distance from
the source as the flow "accelerates" into the lower density regions
further out from the embedded outflow source. However, their results
proved inconclusive in that the momentum profiles along the six
outflows considered peaked roughly in the centre of each flow lobe.
Motivated by these ideas, and unswayed by this disappointing result, we
have since mapped, at JCMT in CO J=3-2, the outflow driven by
RNO 15-FIR. Early CO maps of this region had insufficient resolution
to separate the RNO 15-FIR outflow from other, neighbouring systems.
However, in a recent H_2 image of the region, Davis et al. (1997,
A&A, in press) discovered a sequence of compact line emission features
which imply the presence of a highly-collimated, bipolar outflow driven
by RNO 15-FIR. The new CO data confirm the existence of this bipolar
flow, and furthermore allow us to distinguish between entrainment
models. We achieve this by comparing the submillimetre data with the
near-IR observations, and by measuring the distribution of momentum
along the flow lobes. We also find remarkable evidence of directional
variability along this outflow.
Prompt or turbulent entrainment?
In Fig.1 we present an integrated-intensity map showing the
blue-shifted and red-shifted CO outflow lobes superimposed onto a
near-IR image of the region. The H_2 line-emission features in this
image, labelled A, B and C, are thought to be molecular shocks along
the flow axis. The high degree of collimation apparent in the
RNO 15-FIR CO outflow and the close association between the CO outflow
and the H_2 knots (A, B and C) indicate that the outflow is driven by
a collimated jet. Indeed, the spatial coincidence between the 3 peaks
in the CO map and the 3 molecular shocks traced in
H_2 suggest that (1) these H_2 shocks are those which entrain much
of the ambient gas to form the CO outflow, and that (2) the prompt
entrainment mechanism dominates over turbulent entrainment.

Figure 1: A 2.122 micron image of the RNO 15-FIR outflow region with, overlayed, contours of the high-velocity CO 3-2 emission. The cross
marks the IRAS position of the outflow source RNO 15-FIR; the
neighbouring source, RNO 15, which also drives a CO outflow (in a
northwest-southeast direction) is offset by (108" , -58")
from RNO 15-FIR. Note how the red-shifted flow lobe from RNO 15
encroaches on the red lobe from RNO 15-FIR.
In Fig.2 we plot the mass per unit length (dM/dR), momentum per
unit length (dP/dR), and mean velocity per unit length (d/dR
= [dP/dR]/[dM/dR]) along the outflow axis, integrated across the width
of the flow and over the high-velocity blue-shifted and red-shifted
line wings. In both the northeastern, red-shifted flow lobe, and the
southwestern, blue-shifted flow lobe, the mass and momentum decrease
with distance from the source. This decrease is most dramatic in the
blue-shifted lobe (at negative offsets in Fig.2). The mean velocity,
on the other hand, appears to be relatively constant along both flow lobes.

Figure 2: Distribution of mass (integral T_b.dv -- crosses), momentum
(integral T_b.v.dv -- dots+circles), and mean velocity (dots) along the
RNO 15-FIR outflow axis. Profiles for the blue-shifted (v < 2.0 km/s)
and red-shifted (v > 7.4 km/s) high-velocity gas are plotted, measured
at 5" intervals, from the sum of spectra in strips perpendicular to,
though centred on, the outflow axis. dM/dR, dP/dR and d/dR are
normalised to the maximum measured values. The offsets are in
arcseconds from RNO 15-FIR (positive `x' is towards the northeast).
Opacity at low outflow velocities is likely to have the most severe
effect on the mass and momentum estimates in Fig.2. However, these
errors have little influence on the {emphasise distribution} of mass
and momentum, since the mass and momentum profiles have the same
overall shape in spite of the fact that the momentum is weighted to
higher velocities. Consequently, the profiles in Fig.2 are believed to
be an accurate representation of the true distributions. The
{emphasise decreasing momentum profiles}, in both the blue-shifted and
red-shifted flow lobes, therefore add considerable weight to the idea
that {emphasise the prompt entrainment mechanism dominates in RNO
15-FIR}.
Variability in the RNO 15-FIR molecular jet
Curving molecular outflows have been observed in a number of
star-forming regions. However, a ``wiggling'' molecular outflow has,
to our knowledge, so far not been reported. Variability in jets is
seemingly a common occurance so it seems reasonable that jet-driven
molecular outflows might also show signs of directional variability.
The high-velocity flow lobes in Fig.1 hint at regular deviations in
the outflow direction from the nominal flow axis. To examine this
possibility, we have fit a gaussian profile to the integrated intensity
contours in Fig.1, at 5" intervals along the RNO 15-FIR
outflow axis, each gaussian being perpendicular to the flow axis. A
straight line fit through these points leads to a more precise measure
of the orientation of the outflow axis, which we find to be
47.2 degrees E of N.

Figure 3: Plot of high-velocity emission centriods (thick dots) along
the outflow axis. A sinusoidal least-squares fit is also plotted.
The centroid of each gausian fit is plotted in Fig.3; here, the
nominal outflow axis is orientated along the x-axis. The deviation of
each point from this x-axis we therefore consider as being due to the
wiggling of the molecular flow. The plot in Fig.3 suggests a
sinusoidal distribution, so we fit these data with a function of the
form y = Asin(2.pi/B)sin(2.pi.x/(lambda - xC), where x is
measured (in arcseconds) along the outflow axis. We have excluded from
this least-squares fit data points in the range 0" -- 55" ,
because here the RNO 15-FIR outflow overlaps the red-shifted outflow
lobe from another, nearby source, RNO 15 (the end of the red
lobe from RNO 15 is evident to the southeast of RNO 15-FIR in
Fig.1). To the remaining points we obtain a good fit, which
indicates that the outflow is indeed wiggling, with an amplitude A =
2.4" and wavelength lambda = 35.0". We also find that B =
9.0" and C = 0.03, and that the function is point symmetric.
Chris Davis & Tom Ray, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies
Jochen Eisloffel, Thuringer Landessternwarte, Tautenburg
Tim Jenness, Joint Astronomy Centre
Last Modification Date 1997/03/12 - Last Modification Author: gdw
Graeme Watt (gdw)
|