JAC Style guide: template
Message from the Director
An interesting semester of good news/bad news. On the positive front the JCMT
Board approved the long-term development plan put to it at the November Board.
This was the result of a huge amount of work by staff at the JAC and elsewhere,
in preparing detailed and costed design studies of a range of possible options.
The approved plan sees the JCMT embarking on the construction of a focal plane
345 GHz heterodyne array receiver and a brand-new digital correlator to go
with it. This development will serve the JCMT well in terms of its scientific
output and standing well into the next Century. The possibility of becoming
involved with the Smithsonian Submillimeter Array continues to excite the
community and expenditure is approved to convert JCMT IF systems to match
those of the SMA. When this is complete, the JCMT should just look like
another antenna to the SMA control system. These are the major thrusts of the
funded development plans over the next five years.
One of the major drivers of the development plan is to improve efficiency of
collecting data. This ranges from a new observatory and telescope control
system to improving the surface accuracy. Both have been funded. The latter,
in the first instance, will see the replacement of the panel adjuster
electronics so that the surface that can be better set and subsequently
adjusted for temperature variations. The next step would be to look for panel
refurbishments or new panels and this is one of the possibilities vying for
the unallocated funds. The JCMT Board agreed that this will be decided in
two-year's time and competing projects include a new 230 GHz receiver, more
pixels for the heterodyne array, a high frequency heterodyne camera, and more
channels for the correlator.
In terms of new instruments, the current 230 GHz A-band receiver (which was
upgraded last year with a new mixer) will be replaced by a new receiver, the
conversion of the now-replaced 345 GHz receiver (RxB3i). This will give
improved performance and much better operational efficiency and reliability.
For completeness it should be remembered that new instruments previously
approved include a new 800-900 GHz receiver (the conversion of the current
450 GHz receiver RxC2) and a SCUBA polarimeter. Both of these are under
construction.
The new 345 GHz receiver (RxB3) has had a chequered life at the telescope -
when it works it has been excellent (giving up to a 5-fold increase in
observing speed-up over its predecessor - RxB3i). However, it has not yet
demonstrated the reliability that we expect and require for a facility
instrument. RxB3 was a casualty of the move of labs of HIA from Ottawa to
Victoria and we accepted delivery at a time when we were knowingly aware this
receiver was not as mature as we would have preferred. We have worked very
closely with the receiver builders and I am delighted to say that as of the
past couple of weeks, this receiver now looks to be well on the way to being
extremely reliable, as well as very sensitive with its dual-polarization
set-up. Indeed, when I was at the telescope yesterday it had just been used
for an 'on-the-fly' map of the central arcminute of comet Hale-Bopp in CO.
Our new dual-band (450 GHz and 600 GHz), and dual-polarization receiver, RxW,
has suffered further delays and it's delivery is not yet known, although a
May-June delivery remains a possibility. The receiver builders at MRAO now
have all four mixers installed in the main cryostat and have reported
excellent noise temperatures. We await its arrival with considerable
excitement.
And now to SCUBA. As I noted in my last Newsletter message, SCUBA was having
problems in its commissioning. I'm afraid to say that these have continued.
We eventually got on top of most of the problems of the sensitivity, traced to
faulty filters and a mis-match of the bolometer cavity to the incoming
radiation field. Unfortunately, since the December cool-down, progress has
been very disappointing due to two unexpected problems, neither of which had
occurred previously. The cryogenic stability deteriorated markedly,
accompanied by a very large increase in the noise from the detectors. Two
further cool-downs failed to cure these problems and the approved astronomical
observations for the community had to be postponed.
Where are we now? New filters have been built and tested by Peter Ade at Queen
Mary College and we are all now confident that this particular problem is
solved. We also believe we have a good handle on the bolometer mis-match and
expect that the next cool-down should see very significant improvements in
sensitivity. Unfortunately, the cool-down last week (March 10th) failed to
reach base temperature, and we are now in the process of another cool-down.
If the cryogenic stability and noise problems have been cured, then we will
complete the astronomical commissioning (including determining new flat-fields)
and then commence immediately on the astronomical programme for users.
I should stress that the news is not all bad. Early-on we obtained some very
spectacular images that have been shown on the web or at the AAS meeting. The
improvement over a single-pixel device is incredible (as you would expect)
and this is just the very beginning. We have also managed to get 'on-the-fly'
scan-mapping almost working, and this will open up an entirely new field of
submillimetre studies and will help SCUBA realise its potential as an imaging
instrument. The SCUBA news page is being updated (at least) on a monthly
basis, so this is where to stay tuned for new information.
For general operations, once again, the projects described above have consumed
the majority of the efforts of JAC staff, although some time has been devoted
to other areas. After a marked deterioration in reliability, the whole JCMT
telephone system was replaced in February. Also in February, a severe pointing
problem was noticed which manifested itself as large (~10") variations in
azimuth pointing at specific values of azimuth. This has been diagnosed as a
problem with the antenna central bearing. The effect is being compensated for
by an extra term in the pointing look-up tables; we now need to decide whether
to replace the bearing (at considerable cost and effort).
Because of the SCUBA commissioning and potential astronomical serviced
observing, the JCMT schedule has been in a state of constant flux, and Graeme
Watt is to be congratulated on his efforts to keep everything afloat, so as to
speak. However, because of the SCUBA serviced mode and the serviced SCUBA
heterodyne back-ups, it has meant that we have had very few observers visiting
the JCMT. In my mind, far too few. Because of this, and the additional cost of
undertaking the observations using JAC staff, we will not undertake another
semester like the last one. Despite the continuing need to commission SCUBA
and RxW, we will definitely undertake to schedule-in observers programmes with
the observers coming out to Hawaii. Hopefully, these runs can be flexibly
scheduled within a defined window so that the observer can be present for an
extended time in Hawaii, and perhaps will be able to undertake the back-up
programmes in lieu of their own. Careful work remains to be done before we
embark on a full implementation of this, and discussions with the user
community, time allocation communities and funding agencies will be undertaken
over the coming months.
Finally I should move on to two domestic aspects, staffing and Prior Options.
The former has seen some notable changes, especially in the recruitment of new
staff, and we are already seeing the benefit of their expertise. Prior Options
has, unfortunately, sapped effort at the JAC and some of the work that we had
intended to do has slipped. It is to be hoped that the uncertainty surrounding
this process will be soon removed and we can get back to concentrating on
delivering high quality and cost effective science.
Ian Robson,
Director, JCMT
March 17th, 1997.
Last Modification Date 1997/03/17 - Last Modification Author: Graeme Watt (gdw)
|