JAC Style guide: template
SCUBA: The Final Delivery Date
Yes, SCUBA really is going to be delivered to Hawaii in April 1996 ! At a recent project meeting in
Edinburgh it was agreed with the Director, JCMT that, barring some totally unexpected disaster or act of
God, SCUBA will leave ROE on April 3rd. After tests in Hilo and mounting on JCMT, first light is
expected in early July.
So what is SCUBA anyway? For those readers new to the JCMT or whose head has been firmly
buried in the sand for the past few years it is a submillimetre camera and photometer. It has 2 arrays of
detectors, one of 37 pixels optimised for 850 micron and one of 91 pixels optimised for 450 micron. These 2
arrays look out simultaneously at the same area of sky with a field-of-view of approximately 2.3 arcminutes.
Each pixel is diffraction limited, which corresponds to a resolution of 7 arcseconds at 450 micron and 14
arcseconds at 850 micron. There is a filter mechanism which means that the 850 micron array can also be used at
750 micron or 600 micron and the 450 micron array can be used at 350 micron, with slightly less than optimised sensitivity
and resolution. In addition to the arrays there are 3 separate pixels individually optimised for 1100, 1400
and 2000 micron. These pixels look out simultaneously but are offset from each other on the sky. All the
detectors in SCUBA will be able to achieve background photon-noise limited sensitivity (it achieves this by
cooling the detectors to 0.1K). To enable accurate calibration of data, SCUBA also has a sky transmission
calibration system and an internal calibrator to remove variations in detector sensitivity.
Laboratory results: The reason we are all now so confident is that the recent laboratory results
are so impressive. Just before Christmas 1995, 93% of the 131 pixels were operating to specification, and
have been shown to remain so even with vibration levels on the cryostat 10 times that measured on the
Nasmyth platform. Figure 1 shows the noise spectrum of one of the SCUBA 850 micron detectors under three
different background conditions, as measured through the SCUBA electronics system. The lowest curve
shows the noise measured with the filter drum closed, i.e. system noise, the highest curve shows the noise
looking out at the lab, i.e. photon noise from a 300K black-body, and the middle curve shows noise
measured with a reflector at the cryostat window so the detectors are looking back at a temperature of
approximately 50K, very close to the effective temperature of the sky at Mauna Kea at 850 micron on a good
night. The clear separation of these three curves shows that SCUBA is background-limited. The noise
performance has also been shown to be completely stable over a 10 hour period. The optical performance
has been shown to be very satisfactory. Figure 2 shows a map of a point source with the LW array with
contours at 1-10% of the peak.

Figure 1: Noise spectrum from one of the 850 micron detectors under 3 different background
conditions.
Remaining work: The remaining laboratory work is predominantly getting the other 7% of the
pixels working to spec. These are mainly known faults and errors which are being fixed at time of writing
in preparation for a cold run starting mid-February which may be the final laboratory cold run (although we
do have enough time to have one more if necessary). There is also still a little work remaining on testing
out observing software as far as possible and in completing the overall flatfielding of the arrays.
Expected sensitivities: This is all many of you will be interested in no doubt! SCUBA will be
background-noise limited, as promised, however until such time as we actually get onto the telescope we do
not know whether the background noise will be pure photon-noise or whether systematic sky variation
("sky-noise") will dominate. It seems highly likely that there will be sky-noise, but it is not known at what
level. We do have software schemes for using the fact that we have an array to reduce any sky noise that
may be present but again until we actually have real data the effectiveness cannot be guaranteed.
Nonetheless we can still make some predictions, erring slightly on the conservative side. The following
table shows a predicted noise-equivalent flux density (NEFD) at 450 micron, 850 micron and 1100 micron, along with
the equivalent 5-sigma detection level in 5 minutes and 1 hour. However it is essential to bear in
mind, that these are only estimates based on very best weather.
filter NEFD 5 sigma in 5 mins 5 sigma in 1 hour
(mJy Hz-1/2) (mJy) (mJy)
450 500 150 42
850 40 12 3
1100 40 12 3
Observing modes: The observing modes for SCUBA were described in some detail in the
March 1994 JCMT Newsletter. To recap there are three main modes: a) Point-source photometry , which is
pretty much identical to a single-pixel photometer; b) "Jiggle- mapping" where a map of a source smaller
than the total field-of-view is made by moving the secondary mirror to obtain a fully-sampled image, as was
shown in Figure 4 of the March 1994 issue and; c) "Chop-scan" where a map of a large region is made by
scanning the telescope across the sky to obtain a fully-sampled strip as was shown in Figure 5 of the March
1994 issue.

Figure 2: Fully-sampled jiggle map of a point source at 850 microns, aligned on the central pixel of
the LW Array. (There are 10 contours, starting at 1% and increasing in 1% increments).
In all three cases data is obtained simultaneously with the long and short-wave arrays. The 1.1, 1.4 and 2.0
micron "photometric" pixels look out at the sky simultaneously but offset from each other. Thus observations
of a point or small source the telescope has to be offset from one to the other but for a large source all three
could be scanned over the same area with only a slight offset between the maps at the edges.
So wish us luck for the remaining tests and we will post the first telescope results on the Web as soon as we
get them. Elsewhere in this issue there are details of the likely timescales and deadlines for applications for
SCUBA. There is also a summary of the results of laboratory polarimetry tests with SCUBA.
Walter K. Gear
SCUBA Project Scientist
Last Modification Date 1996/04/08 - Last Modification Author: Graeme Watt (gdw)
|